Argumentative Essay Gladwell Vs. Epstein - 1546 Words

Argumentative Essay: Gladwell vs Epstein â€Å"I can control my destiny, but not my fate. Destiny means there are opportunities to turn right or left, but fate is a one-way street. I believe we all have the choice as to whether we fulfill our destiny, but our fate is sealed† (Paulo Coelho). In other words, people can control what they want to do in life, but they cannot choose what happens in that matter. Do people have a choice to succeed or is it naturally given to someone? In the Outliers: The Story of Success, by Malcolm Gladwell, the author argues that people make their own success in life, by using examples of music skill, performance, and other talents to back up his claim. On the other hand, The Sports Gene, by David Epstein, argues†¦show more content†¦The professionals, on the other hand, steadily increased their practice time every year, until by the age of twenty they, like the violinists, had reached ten thousand hours (Gladwell 4). In other words, this s hows that with hard work and practice, people would be able to succeed and advance, potentially creating a more meaningful destiny for themselves, thus, showing that people create their own destiny, rather than success being given to them. If someone were to put a little effort, they would show little results, meaning they would have less improvement, comparing to someone who was to put a lot of effort, who would show major results and big improvements. He uses logos through both of his reasonings, showing that the amount of time that a student practices shows how well they do, and proving that it’s not being an ability that was given to them. With this being said, Gladwell better answers the essential question using logos, compared to Epstein, because Gladwell goes into more depth on how a number of hours impact a student’s ability to improve. Another way that proves that Gladwell better answers the essential question is through a different use of logos, going in depth in the experiments made by psychologists. A quote that supports this claim is, The striking thing about Ericssons study is that heShow MoreRelatedStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pages6 (2005), pp. 1185–1203; and S. E. Scullen, M. K. Mount, and T. A. Judge, â€Å"Evidence of the Construct Validity of Developmental Ratings of Managerial Performance,† Journal of Applied Psychology 88, no. 1 (2003), pp. 50–66. 9. F. Luthans, â€Å"Successful vs. Effective Real Managers,† Academy of Management Executive (May 1988), pp. 127–132; and F. Luthans, R. M. Hodgetts, and S. A. Rosenkrantz, Real Managers (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1988). See also F. Shipper and J. Davy, â€Å"A Model and Investigation of